You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘directors dealings’ tag.

Back in May this year four executive members of the board (White, Farley, Kiloran and Bryant) of Persimmon (PSN, 377p) sold shares at 567p. Within eight weeks Persimmon shares were trading at 220p.

On September 30th we saw the first purchase of shares at Persimmon by the senior independent non executive director David Thompson. Mr Thompson invested almost GBP 80,000 for various members of his family by buying 20,000 shares at 398p.

Thompson increased his (and his familys’) holding in Persimmon by 50%, taking their holding to 60,000 shares.

These purchases don’t score highly on my ‘significance’ rating, because only one director is buying shares. I thought it worth recording though due to the size (GBP 80k) and the increase in shareholding (50%).

View of directors dealings: Positive- director is buying shares

Significance of the transaction: Low / Weak as only one director buying shares

Two non execs have decided enough’s enough, and ‘caught the falling knife’ by buying shares in Xstrata (XTA, 1310p).

Ian Strachan on October 2nd bought 5700 shares at GBP 17.19, investing GBP 97k and increasing his holding by over 60%. His colleague Claude Lamoureux on October 9th bought 4000 shares at GBP 13.78, investing GBP 55k. I don’t think he held any shares prior to this purchase.

If we look back to earlier this year, a number of executive directors including Trevor Reid (CFO), Santiago Zalmdumide (Executive Director), and Michael Davis (CEO) all exercised options and sold all their shares at between 3470p and 4342p (source: Company website, Digitallook, London Stock Exchange)_ Usual behaviour by directors is to sell a number of shares sufficient to pay the tax on the exercised share options, usually 40%. I’m not sure what the tax liability would be for these directors.

A sale of all the shares exercised indicates to me that they thought the shares were fully valued. How right they were. The share price of Xstrata fell from a high of 4420p in May to 1223p last week. 

Are the purchases by the two non execs of significance? Yes, they are significant in $$ terms, in terms of increase in shareholdings, and there are two directors acting.

Value of signal: Positive- Directors buying shares

Strength of signal: Medium

I’m back from my hols. The last time I went sailing I returned to find my portfolio hit by close on 50% due to a severe inventory shock at Nokia handsets. This time it’s probably almost as bad, although I haven’t dared log in to check yet.

I’ll warn you the next time I’m on the water!

I notice that Cairn Energy (CNE, 1582p) directors have been buying shares (see Sharecast article ‘Cairn Energy Bosses buy in’ here). If you look at the purchases though, you’ll see that although between them they invested GBP 480k, the directors have increased their position sizes by less than 10%. This is not sufficient to warrant a STRONG signal with a positive angle, but would warrant a MEDIUM signal due to the high number of directors buying (seven in total).

Lets now go back to April 7th this year, when I wrote ‘Cairn Energy- non execs reduce holdings substantially’. Four directors had sold shares, including the CEO Gammell and the director of exploration Watts (read the full article by clicking on the link above). The big important message to the market was provided through share sales by non execs Murray and Hart who sold between 1/3rd and half their holdings

Back then the share price was 2915p. Cairn are now 1582p.

That is a fall in the value of Cairn Energy shares of 45%. Over the same period the FTSE 100 index is down by 25%.

So if you listened to the directors message (not mine- it’s the directors that sold shares, they provided information to the market through their actions) in April, and sold your Cairn shares, I’d be happy now to close that short/sale with a 45% return.

Thankyou Norman Murray and Todd Hart.

Signal: directors buying = positive

Signal strength: MEDIUM ( many directors buying but insufficient size to warrant a Strong signal)

For all Cairn comments on this site click here, or enter ‘Cairn’ in the search box to the left.

MAN Group (EMG, 316p) directors have announced the purchase of warrants in MAN, spending GBP 930,000 to give them exposure to 1.64m shares in MAN Group plc.

The warrants cost 57.59p each, and give them a return of the average share price over three years less the strike price (undisclosed). For details of directors transactions see the MAN Group plc website.

Peter Clarke CEO bought 1.12m warrants. He also owns 4.6m shares having picked up a few more last week just short of four pounds.

Kevin Hayes CFO bought 260,000 warrants, as did Christof Moller, who sold 45812 shares to pay for them.

John Aisbitt, non executive Chairman, bought 100,000 shares at 340p taking his holding to 1.6m shares.

Are these moves significant?

I see the warrants as a way to reduce risk to the downside (you only lose 57.59p if the company goes bust, not 300p+), and would prefer to see outright share purchases as a stronger signal of a directors commitment to the group.

Having said that I think these purchases say more about the directors using their experience to see a buying opportunity where others see collapsing markets.

So these purchases count a WEAK Signal.

MAN Group results (link to Dow Jones comment here  ) were announced yesterday, revealing a 40% drop in performance fees in the first half, but a reassuring statement on regulatory capital.

Serica Energy (SQZ, 58p) announced yesterday September 29th that six directors had bought shares in the company on September 26th at prices between 49p and 53p. They also announced that they had the same day (September 26th) received a written share offer from Salamander valuing the shares at 70p. Link to both announcements here.

I’ve a few questions of Serica management:

1. Did you buy shares on the 26th September before or after you had received the wriiten offer from Salamander (valuing the share offer for Serica at 70p using the September 26th closing prices of Salamander and Serica)?

2. Had you received a verbal offer from Salamander prior to the written offer? And was that before or after you bought shares for yourselves?

3. Were you in discussions which may or may not have led to an offer for the company at the time you bought shares on August 15th (see my post of  August 16th ‘Serica – Three directors invest GBP 440k’) ?

My view of August 16th was

‘I consider Fridays purchases to be more significant as three directors are buying, investing significant amounts, and increasing their positions by an average of 20%. Signal strength: STRONG’.

With now 6 directors of a board of 8 buying shares, and an offer on the table, my view remains positive based on the value of directors share dealings in Serica Energy.

Signal Strength remains STRONG.

Disclosure: I have a position in Serica Energy.

Firstly I want to thank all of the respondents to my question as to how to improve this website. I very much appreciate you taking the time to help me improve this product. THANKYOU. If you have any further comments, please send them in !

A summary of my thoughts from last week (click on stock name to get the article/post) :

Axis Shield (ASD) – Signal strength MEDIUM –  Positive- Ex Chairman of Axis (before merger with Shield) Erik Hornnaess, is seen to be payer pretty high levels for shares in his alma mater Axis Shield. The stock is up 40% relative to the market so far this year. This is postive for two reasons: a) as a non exec he knows what’s going on within the group. b) as an ex chairman he knows this business inside out. Also- if you look back you’ll see he is supported by consistent buying from directors earlier in the year.

Reckitt Benckiser (RB.)- no signal- interesting activity nonetheless, with EVP de Groot buying aggressively, and CEO Bart Becht selling shares he exercised earlier.

RBS (RBS)- Weak signal – Negative – The whole board of RBS subscribed for shares at 200p in the June offering. Now we see two directors selling. Either they need the cash, or they think there is downside risk in the shares. Or both.

Rathbones (RAT)- Medium signal- Negative – Two directors of Rathbone have taken advantage of a 50% jump in the share price to top slice their positions in the group. It is interesting to see the same thing happening at another private client broker/adviser Hargreaves Lansdown, where three directors are selling.

Tate and Lyle (TATE) – Strong signal- Positive- Six directors bought shares last week after the shares fell 10% on a court ruling. Since October last year seven directors out of a board of 10 have been buying shares, a significant proportion.

ITV (ITV) – Weak signal- Positive- CFO, Director of Television, and Deputy Chairman have all bought shares in the last week at around 1/3rd of last years share price. We may start to see more news on costcutting at the group, although I need to see more directors share buying before being convinced. In the meantime ITV goes on the watchlist. 

AIG (AIG) – no signal- my thoughts on Hank Greenberg reportedly selling shares in AIG whilst lending his support to the ‘rescue’.

Disclosure: I have a position in Axis Shield.

This must be a classic case of saying one thing and doing another. Hank Greenberg reportedly raised $129m by selling down his stake in AIG (AIG) whilst extolling the virtues of the company.

My view: ‘Actions speak louder than words’, the basis and reason for my analysis of directors dealings.

You must read FT Alphavilles article on this share sale. Click here.

 

Up almost 50% from Julys low (730p), Rathbone (RAT, 1060p) (chart) are seeing a couple of their Executive Directors take advantage of a strong share price to reduce their exposure.

Richard Smeeton has sold (on 19/9/08) 12,000 shares at 1035p taking his holding to 115,673 shares, and Andrew Morris has sold (23/9/08) 11,791 shares at 1063p, taking his holding down to 41,268 shares.

Another two directors (Ian Buckley and Richard Loader) have also sold, but in much smaller size. 

These trades echo selling at Hargreaves Lansdowne (see my posts here), also up 50% from the lows, where three directors continue to sell.

Four directors selling, but not a significant portion of their holding, warrants a MEDIUM strength signal. The risks lie on the downside.

Addendum October 14th:

Further sales have been reported as follows:

Clive Hexton, on the board of Rathbone Investment Management, has sold 5200 shares at 983p taking his holding to 8700 shares (October 6th), and

Hugh Adlington, at Rathbones Investment Management London, has sold 10,000 shares at 987p, taking his holding to 44,000 shares (October 3rd).

Directors of Roc Oil (ROC, 58.5p) were consistently selling shares in late 2007 at prices between 128p and 150p (Clement, Dobinson, Jolliffe, Jansma all sold between October and December 2007 at between 128p and 150p).

I noticed a change of behaviour last week, as two executive directors bought shares.

Dennis Paterson, President of Roc Oil China, bought 87,000 shares at 43p on August 26th, taking his holding to 87,000 shares plus options on a further 470,000.

Bruce Clement, Acting CEO, bought 40,000 shares at 113 Aussie cents to 114 Aussie cents on August 25th and 29th. This purchase took his position to 120,000 shares and options on a further 680,000.

In $ terms these purchases are not significant, but in terms of the % increase in holding, and the behavioral change from selling to buying, I believe they are significant.

The value of this directors share purchase as a signal for investors will be graded MEDIUM, subject to an upgrade if we see further purchases.

Roc Oil is listed on AIM in London, and on the ASX in Sydney.

A mail from John Mauldin has just hit my inbox. He picks up on a comment by Soc Gen showing that analysts are always behind the curve when it comes to earnings forecasts (did you know this?). He goes on to conclude that the likely fall in company earnings this recession is nowhere near being discounted by the share market (see http://www.frontlinethoughts.com/index.asp article ‘Asleep at the wheel’).

I’ve borrowed from the newsletter an interesting slide summarising a recent Duke University CFO survey which strengthens my argument for watching directors behaviour, in preference to listening to what they say. Notably that

..CFOs are around 57% optimistic about the economy…., but are 68% optimistic about the outlook for their own firms!’

Duke University CFO Survey

Add to Technorati Favorites

Prefer to get emails? Click here

RSS Find us on twitter.com/directorsdeals

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

twitter

January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031